Ehrenberg, S. N. et al. (2006): Porosity-permeability relationships in interlayered limestone-dolostone reservoirs

Leg/Site/Hole:
ODP 194
ODP 194 1193
Identifier:
2006-022813
georefid

10.1306/08100505087
doi

Creator:
Ehrenberg, S. N.
Statoil, Stavanger, Norway
author

Eberli, G. P.
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, United States
author

Keramati, M.
National Iranian Oil Company, Iran
author

Moallemi, S. A.
author

Identification:
Porosity-permeability relationships in interlayered limestone-dolostone reservoirs
2006
AAPG Bulletin
American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, OK, United States
90
1
91-114
Porosity and permeability data from five carbonate platform successions of different settings, ages, and burial depths are examined to identify overall similarities and differences in the reservoir quality of interlayered limestones and dolostones. Each succession consists mainly of limestone and dolostone, with subordinate proportions of intermediate, partly dolomitized compositions. In the three deeply buried platforms, the key features are that limestones have much lower average porosity than associated dolostones, and that limestones and dolostones show little difference in average permeability-for-given-porosity. In contrast, the shallowly buried platforms show little difference in average porosity between limestones and dolostones and also display higher average permeability-for-given-porosity in dolostones than limestones. These data suggest the following general guidelines for depositional and diagenetic controls on reservoir architecture in carbonates consisting of interlayered limestone and dolostone. (1) Reservoir compartmentalization by the formation of tight limestone barriers is largely a burial diagenetic process involving calcite cementation locally produced by chemical compaction. (2) Both the pattern of early dolomitization and the distribution of clay minerals (because they influence the localization of chemical compaction) are key factors that determine the distribution of tight limestone barriers separating flow units. Thus, the pattern of eventual burial compartmentalization follows a template that is hardwired into the stratigraphic architecture by depositional mineralogy and early diagenesis. (3) After burial (2-3 km; 1.2-1.8 mi), dolostones should not be expected to have higher permeability-for-given-porosity than associated limestones. These rules assume dolomitization to occur early relative to chemical compaction, which will commonly be the case because of combined hydrologic and mass-balance constraints. Dolomitization and concentration of clay appear linked to cycle and sequence architecture in the present examples and thus may have a useful degree of predictability, at least in terms of statistical parameters, such as net/gross and probability of flow-unit thickness distribution.
English
Serial
Coverage:Geographic coordinates:
North:71.0000
West:-79.3000East: 159.0000
South:-25.0000

Economic geology, geology of energy sources; Sedimentary petrology; Bahamas; burial diagenesis; carbonate platforms; carbonate rocks; carbonatization; Carboniferous; Caribbean region; compaction; compartmentalization; controls; Coral Sea; cores; cycles; diagenesis; dolomitization; dolostone; early diagenesis; Europe; Finnmark Norway; Leg 194; limestone; Madison Group; Marion Plateau; mass balance; Mississippian; Norway; Ocean Drilling Program; ODP Site 1193; Pacific Ocean; paleogeography; Paleozoic; permeability; petroleum; porosity; reservoir properties; reservoir rocks; Scandinavia; sedimentary rocks; South Pacific; Southwest Pacific; spatial distribution; statistical analysis; thickness; West Indies; West Pacific; Western Europe;

.